Clines, Jeremy Mark Sebastian (2011). Earthing common worship: an ecotheological critique of the Common Worship texts of the Church of England. University of Birmingham. Ph.D.
|
Clines_11_PhD.pdf
Download (1MB) |
|
![[img]](http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//style/images/fileicons/text_plain.png) |
Clines_11_PhD_Appendix_1.csv
Plain Text Download (207kB) |
|
|
Clines_11_PhD_Appendix_2.csv
Plain Text Download (207kB) |
|
|
Clines_11_PhD_Appendix_3.csv
Plain Text Download (106kB) |
|
|
Clines_11_PhD_Appendix_4.csv
Plain Text Download (5kB) |
|
|
Clines_11_PhD_Appendix_5.pdf
Download (123kB) |
|
|
Clines_11_PhD_Appendix_6.pdf
Download (47kB) |
|
|
Clines_11_PhD_Appendix_7.csv
Plain Text Download (69kB) |
|
|
Clines_11_PhD_Appendix_8.csv
Plain Text Download (4kB) |
|
|
Clines_11_PhD_Appendix_9.csv
Plain Text Download (10kB) |
Abstract
This thesis undertakes an interdisciplinary analysis of new Church of England liturgies (Common Worship) from an ecotheological point of view: making use of reader response theory, literary analysis, a social scientific survey, liberation theology, environmental and political ethics and liturgical theology. Chapter 1 considers the theological, political and sociological influences on liturgical reform, which include, inculturation, the expression of ethics in the prayer of the Church, liberation theologies, technology, and agrarianism.
Chapter 2 considers methods of liturgical change and the scope for making creation visible in liturgy. Chapter 3 finds justification in reader response theory for determining ecotheological priorities for critiquing liturgy. Analysis of Common Worship texts occurs: in Chapter 4, using literary analysis; in Chapter 5 via social scientific survey of clergy using Common Worship; Chapter 6 looks in details at Collects and Post Communions and undertakes an ecotheological rewriting of 9 sample texts. Chapter 7 identifies lessons for liturgical revision in general and for eco-liturgical reform in particular, paying particular attention to the dissonant creation theologies unearthed in Common Worship, the necessity for future revisions, and the importance and implication of technological change for liturgical writers and commentators.
| Type of Work: | Thesis (Doctorates > Ph.D.) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Award Type: | Doctorates > Ph.D. | ||||||
| Supervisor(s): |
|
||||||
| Licence: | |||||||
| College/Faculty: | Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Arts & Law | ||||||
| School or Department: | School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion | ||||||
| Funders: | None/not applicable | ||||||
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BL Religion B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BR Christianity B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BT Doctrinal Theology B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BX Christian Denominations H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) |
||||||
| URI: | http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/2838 |
Actions
 |
Request a Correction |
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year