The oppression of children and young people in education settings: A Foucauldian discourse analysis of Educational Psychologists’ constructions

Hayes, Millie Frances (2024). The oppression of children and young people in education settings: A Foucauldian discourse analysis of Educational Psychologists’ constructions. University of Birmingham. Ap.Ed.&ChildPsy.D.

[img] Hayes2024ApEd&ChildPsyD_Vol1_Redacted.pdf
Text - Redacted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (5MB)
[img] Hayes2024ApEd&ChildPsyD_Vol2.pdf
Text - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 December 2034.
Available under License All rights reserved.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Educational psychologists are required to ‘understand and challenge’ oppressive practice and a growing body of research suggests that they perceive ‘social justice’ to be important to their role. However, previous findings indicate perceived barriers to inclusion, including the ‘misuse of power’ in education settings, and the pathologisation of children and young people. The current study presents a Foucauldian Discourse Analysis exploring how educational psychologists construe oppressive discourses used about children and young people in education settings, and their constructions of how they could work against these oppressive discourses. Transcripts from semi-structured interviews with seven qualified Educational Psychologists were analysed, surfacing discourses used about children and young people in schools, the possible construction/s, and implications for action. Through the analysis, discourses of ‘othering’, ‘compliance’, ‘seen not heard’, ‘within-child’ ‘conformity’ and ‘innocence’ were derived, linked to dominant discourses of ‘deviancy’ and perceived to locate difference internally. Constructions about how educational psychologists can work against oppressive discourses of children and young people, highlights ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ approaches, emphasising the role of the ‘critical friend’ and participatory action research.

Type of Work: Thesis (Doctorates > Ap.Ed.&ChildPsy.D.)
Award Type: Doctorates > Ap.Ed.&ChildPsy.D.
Supervisor(s):
Supervisor(s)EmailORCID
Callicott, KatherineUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Howe, JuliaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 All rights reserved
College/Faculty: Colleges > College of Social Sciences
School or Department: School of Education, Department of Disability, Inclusion and Special Needs
Funders: None/not applicable
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
L Education > LA History of education
URI: http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/15351

Actions

Request a Correction Request a Correction
View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year