Reprogramming the signifiers: an analysis of post-truth as a narrative atmosphere deriving from a shift in the sociocultural narratives

Warom, Ren (2023). Reprogramming the signifiers: an analysis of post-truth as a narrative atmosphere deriving from a shift in the sociocultural narratives. University of Birmingham. Ph.D.

[img]
Preview
Warom2023PhD.pdf
Text - Accepted Version
Available under License All rights reserved.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Reprogramming the Signifiers engages in the spirited debate on the origins, effects, and outcomes of the post-truth phenomenon. Adopting a narratological approach and taking the standpoint that post-truth represents a socio-cultural narrative shift, this thesis argues the case for a post-truth narrative atmosphere capable of enacting a profound impact on individual and community psychology and cognition. To that end this work undertakes an analysis of narrative movement through the synthesised space — a descriptor for the enmeshment of the online and offline worlds which the larger proportion of humanity now inhabits – I demonstrate that it is possible to see how the post-truth tectonic is established and maintained by delineating how narrative is warped and bent through these spaces, how it becomes immediately unmoored from its foundational context, creating the atmosphere of confusion, misunderstanding, and obfuscation which embodies the post-truth condition. This work then outlines a series of inbuilt narrative defence mechanisms whose existence has, in some cases, through real-world outcomes caused by obscured narrative movement, broken the grip of post-truth narrative on an audience within the synthesised space. Through these mechanisms, this thesis determines, there is a means to push back against the ongoing effects of post-truth tectonic shift without requiring legislative responses that would inhibit the ability of online spaces to provide a voice for marginalised groups, which has become a vital and powerful fulcrum for global advancement of human rights and freedoms.

Type of Work: Thesis (Doctorates > Ph.D.)
Award Type: Doctorates > Ph.D.
Supervisor(s):
Supervisor(s)EmailORCID
Langley, RichardUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Hayler, MatthewUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Forcer, StephenUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Licence: All rights reserved
College/Faculty: Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Arts & Law
School or Department: School of English, Drama and Creative Studies, Department of Film and Creative Writing
Funders: None/not applicable
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
URI: http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/14043

Actions

Request a Correction Request a Correction
View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year