Examining the utility of assessment tools and group intervention programmes for mentally disordered offenders

Rees-Jones, Angharad (2011). Examining the utility of assessment tools and group intervention programmes for mentally disordered offenders. University of Birmingham. Foren.Psy.D.

[img]
Preview
ReesJones11ForenPsyD.pdf
PDF

Download (1MB)

Abstract

This thesis examines the utility of assessment tools and interventions with mentally disordered offenders (MDOs). A systematic review of the literature explores what can be learnt from efficacy studies of structured group work programmes, focusing upon the evidence base for 'what works'. It is concluded that there is evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural interventions with MDOs but that more rigorous research needs to be conducted. The reliability and validity of the Social Problem Solving Inventory (SPSI) assessment tool is investigated and the limitations of using this tool in practical and research settings is discussed; with particular emphasis on the utility of the tool for research with MDOs. Finally, a novel group-work intervention; the Reasoning and Rehabilitation 2 (R&R2) programme, is investigated. The findings suggest that the R&R2 can be delivered successfully and is effective in reducing antisocial attitudes and beliefs. The low drop-out rate and responsive design of the programme has implications in assisting policy makers and practitioners to make decisions about management and treatment; as well as allocation of resources. The complexities of working with MDOs are highlighted throughout the thesis and the utility of the findings are discussed in relation to future research and intervention strategies.

Type of Work: Thesis (Doctorates > Foren.Psy.D.)
Award Type: Doctorates > Foren.Psy.D.
Supervisor(s):
Supervisor(s)EmailORCID
Dixon, LouiseUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Licence:
College/Faculty: Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Life & Environmental Sciences
School or Department: School of Psychology, Centre for Forensic and Criminological Psychology
Funders: None/not applicable
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
URI: http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/3069

Actions

Request a Correction Request a Correction
View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year