Quinn, Sophie (2020). An evaluation of the power of kindness in primary aged children: a whole-class intervention. University of Birmingham. Ap.Ed.&ChildPsy.D.
|
Quinn2020ApEd&ChildPsyDVol1.pdf
Text - Accepted Version Available under License All rights reserved. Download (2MB) | Preview |
|
Quinn2020ApEd&ChildPsyDVol2.pdf
Text - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 December 2030. Available under License All rights reserved. Download (771kB) |
Abstract
Kindness has been considered ‘the new cool’ (Rowland, 2018), after research has revealed links with improved health, relationships and well-being (Curry et al., 2018). In this study, kindness is central to a whole-class intervention where children are encouraged to develop and practice this virtue. Two theories underpin the programme: positive psychology (Peterson and Seligman, 2004) and neo-Aristotelian character education (Sanderse, 2012).
A mixed methods design was used to evaluate the impact of the six-week intervention on children’s wellbeing, peer acceptance and kindness compared to a control group. Self-report measures were used at three time points – pre-intervention, post-intervention and after a six-week follow up period – alongside a teacher interview and child focus group, post-intervention. Quantitative data revealed that the kindness intervention had no significant effects on well-being, peer acceptance and kindness in children, whilst teacher and child reports indicated positive improvements in prosocial behaviours, emotional regulation and virtue literacy. Interestingly, quantitative correlations indicated a relationship between kindness and both peer acceptance and well-being. The divergence in findings led to critical consideration of data collection methods and possible confounding factors. Teacher and child reports should be treated with caution due to a relatively small number of participants and the possible influence of a response bias. This research highlights the challenges of intervention-based research in schools and possible solutions including an investment in robust training. Children offered invaluable perspectives in helping to understand the outcomes of the study.
Type of Work: | Thesis (Doctorates > Ap.Ed.&ChildPsy.D.) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Award Type: | Doctorates > Ap.Ed.&ChildPsy.D. | |||||||||
Supervisor(s): |
|
|||||||||
Licence: | All rights reserved All rights reserved | |||||||||
College/Faculty: | Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Social Sciences | |||||||||
School or Department: | School of Education, Department of Disability, Inclusion and Special Needs | |||||||||
Funders: | None/not applicable | |||||||||
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology L Education > LC Special aspects of education |
|||||||||
URI: | http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/10934 |
Actions
Request a Correction | |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year