A comparison of rotary and reciprocating nickel titanium preparation in simulated root canals

3085 18 17412 7 30847 document 17412 Round11MPhil.pdf application/pdf b3a88779a76a32e3cd97a2b29231ad5f MD5 7877064 2011-12-02 14:34:23 http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/3085/5/Round11MPhil.pdf 3085 5 2 application/pdf application/pdf en public

Round11MPhil.pdf

accepted http://eprints.org/relation/hasVolatileVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17413 http://eprints.org/relation/hasVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17413 http://eprints.org/relation/hassmallThumbnailVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17413 http://eprints.org/relation/hasVolatileVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17414 http://eprints.org/relation/hasVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17414 http://eprints.org/relation/haspreviewThumbnailVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17414 http://eprints.org/relation/hasVolatileVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17415 http://eprints.org/relation/hasVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17415 http://eprints.org/relation/hasIndexCodesVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17415 17267 5 30507 document 17267 Decl_IS_Round11MPhil.pdf application/pdf 8a40ee3c88044b08a63149bb1d0081de MD5 223093 2011-12-02 12:03:05 http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/3085/2/Decl_IS_Round11MPhil.pdf 3085 2 5 application/pdf application/pdf en staffonly

Decl_IS_Round11MPhil.pdf

http://eprints.org/relation/hasVolatileVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17268 http://eprints.org/relation/hasVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17268 http://eprints.org/relation/hassmallThumbnailVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17268 http://eprints.org/relation/hasVolatileVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17269 http://eprints.org/relation/hasVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17269 http://eprints.org/relation/haspreviewThumbnailVersion http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17269 17268 2 30512 document 17268 small.png image/png 9eea5ca9270800e9491c383120169eb4 MD5 10979 2011-12-02 12:06:34 http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/3085/3/small.png 3085 3 3 image/png thumbnail_small Thumbnail Documents conversion from application/pdf to thumbnail_small en staffonly

small.png

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17267 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17267 http://eprints.org/relation/issmallThumbnailVersionOf http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17267 17269 2 30513 document 17269 preview.jpg image/jpeg af19dda9267b9bf141ff51fb37cdc1a0 MD5 48711 2011-12-02 12:06:34 http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/3085/4/preview.jpg 3085 4 4 image/jpeg image/jpeg Thumbnail Documents conversion from application/pdf to thumbnail_preview en staffonly

preview.jpg

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17267 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17267 http://eprints.org/relation/ispreviewThumbnailVersionOf http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17267 17415 2 30853 document 17415 indexcodes.txt text/plain ff7d0c474826296ab6a159e867950cf2 MD5 29683 2011-12-02 14:35:09 http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/3085/8/indexcodes.txt 3085 8 8 text/plain indexcodes Generate index codes conversion from application/pdf to indexcodes en staffonly

indexcodes.txt

small.png

preview.jpg

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17412 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17412 http://eprints.org/relation/ispreviewThumbnailVersionOf http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/document/17412 archive 4031 disk0/00/00/30/85 2011-12-08 08:16:15 2019-01-23 09:55:30 2011-12-08 08:16:15 thesis show 0 Round Simon Giles Lumley Phillip J. p.j.lumley@bham.ac.uk University of Birmingham A comparison of rotary and reciprocating nickel titanium preparation in simulated root canals unpub RK 10col_mede Aim To evaluate simulated root canal preparation using two different preparation techniques- classical Pro Taper and reciprocating. Operators prepared resin blocks which were either uncovered or covered. Methodology Inexperienced operators were used to prepare simulated canals with ProTaper nickel titanium rotary files using an electric motor in both the classical ProTaper sequence of four files in a continually clockwise rotating action, and in a reciprocating clockwise and anticlockwise fashion using only one file from the ProTaper sequence- the F2. Canals were either covered with tape to obscure vision, or left uncovered. Photographs were taken of the canals before and after preparation, and the images superimposed for comparison. The canals were evaluated against the five requirements of root canal shape described by Schilder in 1974. Conclusion This research demonstrated that the classicalProTaper technique of four files was more likely to produce a preparation meeting Schilder's criteria for ideal mechanical shaping of root canals when compared to the reciprocating technique using one file. It also demonstrated that when the resin blocks were covered, it was more likely that a canal preparation would meet Schilder's criteria for ideal mechanical preparation of root canals than if they were uncovered. 2011-12 2011-09 graduation eng author unchecked This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. public 208 University of Birmingham School of Dentistry m_ph FALSE na 2011-12 graduation