The influence of review strategies on students’ English-language writing performance in a first-year university undergraduate Thai EFL writing context

Puengpipattrakul, Walaipun (2019). The influence of review strategies on students’ English-language writing performance in a first-year university undergraduate Thai EFL writing context. University of Birmingham. Ph.D.

[img] Puengpipattrakul2019PhD.pdf
Text - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 December 2024.
Available under License All rights reserved.

Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The purposes of this mixed-method study are to (i) investigate whether and to what extent review strategies influence the writing performance of first-year Thai undergraduates; (ii) examine the influence of self- and peer-review strategies based on students’ overall English-language proficiency and their varying proficiency groups; and (iii) explore students’ perceptions when applying both strategies in relation to writing development. The main findings are: The statistically significant effect of the review strategies were on the students’ writing performance; t(45) = 17.06; p = .000 at the .05 level. The analyses of the students’ writing-task score development from 184 self-revised and peer-revised draft scripts showed that they effectively responded to the self-review strategy better than they did to the peer-review strategy; t(45) = 3.08; p = .004 at the .05 level. In the multi-dimensional comparisons of writing-score development, both self-review and peer-review strategies can be applied to all three proficiency groups of the Science and Education students. From the scripts of the students’ responses to three series of questionnaires and a semi-structured interview, the findings revealed some insights into aspects of students’ affective ̶ cognitive ̶ social ̶ contextual factors. Implications and recommendation for future studies are also considered.

Type of Work: Thesis (Doctorates > Ph.D.)
Award Type: Doctorates > Ph.D.
Supervisor(s):
Supervisor(s)EmailORCID
John, SuganthiUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Licence: All rights reserved
College/Faculty: Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Arts & Law
School or Department: School of English, Drama and American & Canadian Studies, Department of English Language and Linguistics
Funders: Other
Other Funders: Unspecified
Subjects: P Language and Literature > PE English
URI: http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/9659

Actions

Request a Correction Request a Correction
View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year