eTheses Repository

Fuel cells for domestic heat and power: are they worth it?

Staffell, Iain (2010)
Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham.

Loading
PDF (6Mb)

Abstract

Fuel cells could substantially decarbonise domestic energy production, but at what cost? It is known that these micro-CHP systems are expensive but actual price data has been elusive. Economic realities constrain individuals’ decisions to purchase and national policies on climate change, so this lack of understanding has delayed commercialisation and government support. Models were therefore developed to simulate the economic and environmental benefits from operating fuel cell micro-CHP systems in UK homes, and to project current purchase prices into the near future. These models were supplied with economic and performance data from an extensive meta-review of academic and commercial demonstrations; showing for example that fuel cell efficiencies are a third lower when operated in people’s homes rather than in the laboratory. These data inputs were combined with energy consumption data from 259 houses to give a broad definition of operating conditions in the UK. The techno-economic fuel cell simulation model was validated against results from literature and Japanese field trials, and then used to estimate the changes in home energy consumption from operating the four leading fuel cell technologies in the UK. Fuel cells are shown to offer negligible financial benefits in the UK at present. Energy bills would increase in 30-60% of homes, due in part to the low value of exported electricity. Savings are higher in houses with larger energy bills, but significant variation between similar properties confirms that simple trends cannot be used to identify ideal houses for fuel cell micro-CHP. The feed-in tariff proposed by the UK government would radically improve economic outcomes; as 10p paid per kWh of electricity generation would reward fuel cell owners with £600-750 annually. It is estimated that today’s fuel cells produce 360-450g of CO\(_2\) per kWh of electricity generated due to reforming natural gas into hydrogen on-site. Their carbon intensity is therefore 30-45% lower than the UK grid, enabling average annual emissions reductions of 1-2.2 tonnes per home. These reductions depend strongly on the displaced electricity generation method, and could therefore range from around zero when displacing high efficiency gas turbines up to 5.5 tonnes if displacing coal. From learning-by-doing, the price of Japanese 1kW PEMFC systems is shown to have fallen by 19.1-21.4% for each doubling of production volume. Prices are therefore projected to fall from £15,000 today to £6,000 within 10±5 years, determined primarily by the speed and scale of deployment world-wide. A commercially viable price of around £3,000 is however expected to be two decades away, and widely held targets of under £1,000 per kW are argued to be unobtainable with current technologies due to the requirement for extensive balance of plant and auxiliary systems. Combining all these findings, the payback period of PEMFC systems would be 25-45 years with the proposed 10p/kWh feed-in tariff. This could fall to within current system lifetimes after 5-10 years of cost reductions; however, without this level of government support the savings from operation will be unable to give payback without major improvements in technology performance or more favourable energy prices. The carbon cost of current PEMFC systems is estimated at £750-950 per tonne of CO\(_2\) mitigated. This figure is highly sensitive to the carbon intensity of displaced generation, and would reduce to £175/T if generation from coal plants is avoided. Fuel cells are therefore not among the ‘low hanging fruit’ of carbon abatement technologies, although the carbon costs will halve over the next ten years in line with system price reductions. Investment in this technology must therefore be considered a long term strategy for low-carbon energy production.

Type of Work:Ph.D. thesis.
Supervisor(s):Kendall, Kevin and Green, Richard
School/Faculty:Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Engineering & Physical Sciences
Department:Chemical Engineering
Additional Information:

Research related to this thesis is published in the following papers: I. Staffell, R.Green, and K. Kendall, Cost targets for domestic fuel cell CHP. Journal of Power Sources, 2008. 181(2): p. 339-349. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.068 I. Staffell and R.J. Green, Estimating future prices for stationary fuel cells with empirically derived learning curves. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009. 34(14): p. 5617-5628. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.075 A. Hawkes, I. Staffell, D. Brett, and N. Brandon, Fuel Cells for Micro-Combined Heat and Power Generation. Energy & Environmental Science, 2009. 2: p. 729-744. doi:10.1039/b902222h http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b902222h I. Staffell, P. Baker, J.P. Barton, N. Bergman, R. Blanchard,N.P. Brandon, D.J.L. Brett, A. Hawkes, D. Infield, C.N. Jardine, N. Kelly, M. Leach, M. Matian,A.D. Peacock, S. Sudtharalingam and B. Woodman, UK Microgeneration. Part II: Technology Overviews. Proceedings of the ICE – Energy, 2010. 163(4):p. 143-165. doi:10.1680/ener.2010.163.4.143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/ener.2010.163.4.143 I. Staffell and A. Ingram, Life cycle assessment of an alkaline fuel cell CHP System. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009. 35(6): p. 2491-2505. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.135 5

Subjects:TP Chemical technology
Institution:University of Birmingham
ID Code:641
This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder.
Export Reference As : ASCII + BibTeX + Dublin Core + EndNote + HTML + METS + MODS + OpenURL Object + Reference Manager + Refer + RefWorks
Share this item :
QR Code for this page

Repository Staff Only: item control page