eTheses Repository

Do individuals in mental health neurological outpatient and non-clinical populations have distinct profiles on the common cognitive complaints checklist (CCCC)?

Surridge, Karen Suzanne (2013)
Clin.Psy.D. thesis, University of Birmingham.

Loading
Click on the icons below to preview their contents ...
Surridge13ClinPsy_Vol1.pdf
Surridge13ClinPsy_Vol1.pdf
PDF (3228Kb)Redacted Version

Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 December 2018.
Surridge13ClinPsy_Vol2.pdf
Surridge13ClinPsy_Vol2.pdf
PDF (1899Kb)Accepted Version

Restricted to Repository staff only until 01 July 2023.

Abstract

Objectives: To use the Common Cognitive Complaints Checklist to provide base-rate data of common cognitive complaints in non-clinical individuals; and to identify common cognitive complaints that discriminate between three populations: non-clinical, mental health, mixed-neurological.

Methods: 133 volunteers, recruited from three populations (non-clinical, mental health, mixed-neurological), completed measures of psychological distress, cognitive complaints and intellectual functioning.

Results: The mental health group reported significantly higher levels of distress, and individuals with higher levels of distress tended to report more cognitive complaints. Base-rate data was established by calculating patterns of endorsement in the non-clinical group, providing a profile of ‘normal’ reporting. Three discriminant function analyses were applied, which performed excellently, revealing 26 items that maximally discriminated between the groups.

Conclusions: The base-rate data revealed that it was unusual for individuals in the non-clinical group to report cognitive complaints occurring very frequently. These data could help clinicians determine whether or not the frequency of any complaint is ‘normal’. The calculated discriminant functions for the 26 identified items could be used to plot probabilities of responses falling within each of the three populations, helping clinicians determine the population in which their patients’ responses are likely to fall. Strengths and limitations are discussed along with suggestions for future research.

Type of Work:Clin.Psy.D. thesis.
Supervisor(s):Jones, Christopher and Powell, Theresa
School/Faculty:Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Life & Environmental Sciences
Department:School of Psychology
Keywords:Common Cognitive Complaints, Subjective Cognitive Errors, Cognitive Failures, Mental Health, Brain Injury, Neuropsychological Assessment
Subjects:BF Psychology
Institution:University of Birmingham
ID Code:4143
This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder.
Export Reference As : ASCII + BibTeX + Dublin Core + EndNote + HTML + METS + MODS + OpenURL Object + Reference Manager + Refer + RefWorks
Share this item :
QR Code for this page

Repository Staff Only: item control page