Public law and public management: “theory” and “values” in corporation tax reform
Snape, Edward John (2008)
Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham.
Reforming the UK’s corporation tax code is becoming more of a widespread political concern than the preoccupation of specialists. This functionalist study offers an interpretation, and assesses the arguments. It views the corporation tax code as public law, energised by political values whose meaning and prioritisation are shaped by the prudential logic of effectiveness. The institutions that generate the code, and the challenges of globalisation to the nation state, have highlighted historic tensions between Crown and Parliament, and the latter’s scrutiny of the managerialist governance style that the code’s reform involves. This style is apparent in the ideology of the public interest that reform is designed to promote, a process that involves the skilful balancing of efficiency and fairness. Surprisingly, perhaps, there is little in the conduct of reform that violates the traditions of the UK’s representative democracy. The result is a code that, given its public law status, is a pre-eminent example of political jurisprudence. Its values, their prioritisation, and their change and complexity, are inevitably contentious, because they are the products of representative institutions. Criticism of the code generally understates these points. What are presented as impartial legal arguments are often simply rival views of the public interest.
|Type of Work:||Ph.D. thesis.|
|Supervisor(s):||Salter, David (LL.B.)|
|School/Faculty:||Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Arts & Law|
|Keywords:||Corporation tax reform, functionalism, public law, political values, prudence, effectiveness, Crown and Parliament, managerialist governance, public interest, efficiency, fairness, representative democracy, political jurisprudence|
|Subjects:||KD England and Wales|
HJ Public Finance
|Institution:||University of Birmingham|
|Library Catalogue:||Check for printed version of this thesis|
This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder.
Repository Staff Only: item control page