The overlapping of legal concepts: a legal realist approach to the classification of private law

Salmons, David (2011). The overlapping of legal concepts: a legal realist approach to the classification of private law. University of Birmingham. Ph.D.

Preview

Salmons11PhD.pdf PDF Download (3MB)

Abstract

The main aim of this research is two-fold; firstly, these chapters will seek to demonstrate the unreliability of theoretical or abstract approaches to legal reasoning in describing the law. Secondly, rather than merely providing a deconstruction of previous attempts to classify private law, the chapters attempt to construct an overlapping approach to classification. This represents a new way of classifying private law, which builds on the foundations of the lessons of legal realism and explains how classification can accommodate overlaps to assist in identifying the core elements of private law reasoning. Following the realist tradition, the thesis argues for narrower formulations of the concepts of property, contract and tort. It is then argued that within these narrower concepts, the law is made more predictable and clearer. Importantly, adopting the overlapping analysis, we can explain the areas that we have removed from property, contract and tort as overlaps with these core concepts. The purpose is to recognise that legal concepts can be best understood as links between facts and judicial decision making, and the best way to achieve this is to reject discrete categorisation and, instead, to recognise the overlapping of legal concepts.

Type of Work:	Thesis (Doctorates > Ph.D.)
Award Type:	Doctorates > Ph.D.
Licence:
College/Faculty:	Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Arts & Law
School or Department:	Birmingham Law School
Funders:	None/not applicable
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General) K Law > KD England and Wales
URI:	http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/3227

Actions

	Request a Correction
	View Item

Downloads