Glasbey, James C 
ORCID: 0000-0001-7688-5018
(2023).
Developing a pathway for remote assessment of surgical wounds with partners in low- and middle-income countries: An approach for efficient trials and resilient perioperative systems.
University of Birmingham.
Ph.D.
|
Glasbey2023PhD.pdf
Text - Accepted Version Available under License All rights reserved. Download (6MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common complication of abdominal surgery, and commonly occurs after hospital discharge. When patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) undergo surgery, they are three times more likely to have a SSI than patients in high-income countries. Returning to hospital for routine face-to-face follow-up is the accepted gold standard for diagnosing a SSI but can be challenging in many environments, and resource intensive for healthcare teams.
Aims: The overall aim of this thesis was to develop a high-quality pathway for remote surgical wound assessment using telemedicine that can be delivered flexibly across diverse healthcare settings. First, I aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of telemedicine in the detection of SSI in existing data. Second, I aimed to explore the cross-cultural equivalence of a Wound Healing Questionnaire (WHQ) across several LMICs and make recommendations for its adaptation for use in global surgery research and practice. Third, I aimed to test the feasibility and accuracy of the adapted WHQ in diagnosis of SSI.
Methods: The primary outcome of interest in this thesis was SSI reported up to 30-days after surgery using the US Centres for Disease Control criteria. First, I compared the rates of SSI using telemedicine to those with in-person review in two data sources: (A) an international cohort study of adult patients discharged from hospital before 30-days after abdominal surgery; (B) a systematic review with meta-analysis of rates of SSI detection conducted in accordance with PRIMSA guidelines (PROSPERO:192596). Second, to recommend adaptations to the WHQ outcome measure for global implementation, I conducted a mixed-methods study across seven LMICs. Qualitative data were obtained from interviews and focus groups with local researchers with deductive coding aligned to cognitive theory. Quantitative data were collected in a prospective cohort study and Rasch analysis was used to explore measurement properties of the WHQ. I triangulated these data to make recommendations for cross-cultural and cross-language adaptation. Third, I conducted a validation cohort study within a randomised trial (FALCON, NCT03700749) where consecutive patients undergoing abdominal surgery for a range of indications underwent telephone assessment with the WHQ (index test) up to 72-hours before their face-to-face assessment (reference test). I worked with Community Engagement and Involvement (CEI) partners to optimise the measurement pathway.
Results: The SSI rate reported using telemedicine in the cohort data was lower than with in-person follow-up (11.1% versus 13.4%, p<0.001), which persisted after risk adjustment in a mixed-effects model (adjusted odds ratio: 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.84, p<0.001). This was consistent on meta-analysis of all existing data (odds ratio: 0.67, 0.47-0.94, I2=0.45, p=0.12). Included studies were at a high risk of bias. This indicated the need for a novel, high-quality wound assessment tool. During WHQ adaptation, qualitative data were obtained from 10 structured interviews and 6 focus groups with 47 investigators and quantitative data from 537 patients. Triangulation provided evidence for modification of 9 items, and revision of the response structure. In the validation study, patients were included from three upper-middle (396 patients, 13 hospitals), three lower-middle (746 patients, 19 hospitals), and one low-income country (54 patients, 4 hospitals). Successful telephone contact was achieved in 90.3% (1088/1196) of patients. The WHQ discriminated patients with and without SSI (AUROC 0.869, 95% CI 0.824-0.914). An adapted WHQ cut-off point score of >4 demonstrated sensitivity of 0.701 (0.610-0.792), specificity of 0.911 (0.878-0.9430), positive predictive value of 0.723 (0.633-0.814) and negative predictive value of 0.901 (0.867-0.935).
Discussion: Current methods for remote detection of SSI are inadequate, missing 1 in 3 patients with infection. This thesis describes the adaptation and validation of the WHQ, demonstrating that a telephone pathway for wound assessment is feasible and moderately accurate. The adapted WHQ is now ready for global implementation in research and routine postoperative surveillance, using the co-designed toolkit to optimise local measurement processes.
| Type of Work: | Thesis (Doctorates > Ph.D.) | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Award Type: | Doctorates > Ph.D. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Supervisor(s): |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Licence: | All rights reserved | ||||||||||||||||||
| College/Faculty: | Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Medical & Dental Sciences | ||||||||||||||||||
| School or Department: | Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences | ||||||||||||||||||
| Funders: | National Institute for Health Research | ||||||||||||||||||
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RD Surgery | ||||||||||||||||||
| URI: | http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/13341 |
Actions
 |
Request a Correction |
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year