Hunt, David James (2020). How to be a child, and bid lions and dragons farewell: the consequences of moral error theory. University of Birmingham. Ph.D.
|
Hunt2020PhD.pdf
Text - Accepted Version Available under License All rights reserved. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Moral error theorists argue that moral thought and discourse are systematically in error, and that nothing is, or can ever be, morally permissible, required or forbidden. I begin by discussing how error theorists arrive at this conclusion. I then argue that if we accept a moral error theory, we cannot escape a pressing problem – what should we do next, metaethically speaking? I call this problem the ‘what now?’ problem, or WNP for short. I discuss the attempts others have made to respond to the WNP, and in each case I show that the responses fail to be satisfying. I then propose a new response to the WNP, which I call revolutionary relativism. I define revolutionary relativism, explain why it is preferable to the existing responses to the WNP, and defend it against the most problematic objections I anticipate that opponents might raise. I conclude that revolutionary relativism succeeds where previous WNP responses fail, and that if we accept a moral error theory, we should become revolutionary relativists.
Type of Work: | Thesis (Doctorates > Ph.D.) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Award Type: | Doctorates > Ph.D. | |||||||||
Supervisor(s): |
|
|||||||||
Licence: | All rights reserved | |||||||||
College/Faculty: | Colleges (2008 onwards) > College of Arts & Law | |||||||||
School or Department: | School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion, Department of Philosophy | |||||||||
Funders: | None/not applicable | |||||||||
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) | |||||||||
URI: | http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/10208 |
Actions
Request a Correction | |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year